A review of sample cards, site maps and resident comment slips finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the sample board in Cinder Ward. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: a card was posted without identifying whether the nearby furnace was active.
The sample cards, site maps and resident comment slips lists 96 public samples with a named site and shift; the previous window lists 97. Nazza Wire checked both against public notices checked against the copies households actually received. The source was checked against a second copy held by Grikka Ash. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The plant says the sample meets the public interval. Residents ask for the operating state beside the reading. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how residents can compare air readings with the work taking place at the time.
The clerk closes this docket and assigns the next window a fresh scope. The board closed this docket after it adopted a revised schedule with a worker review period. The next window starts with a fresh record.
