A review of heat transfer meters and cooperative invoices finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the shared heat line at Ember Court. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: one branch warms a workshop before it reaches the upper apartments.
The heat transfer meters and cooperative invoices lists 37 hours a shared line stays within its promised range; the previous window lists 36. Grikka Ash checked both against crew logs compared with the inspection card for the same shift. The source was checked against a second copy held by Vek Cinder. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The operator measures total heat sent. Residents ask for a reading at each branch before credits are calculated. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how the cooperative credits a household when the shared line warms unevenly.
Asecond office compares the count with the posted operating state. The Year fifth, rain shift window 1 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The next invoice will include paired readings from the apartment and workshop branches.
